2. Gravity and orbits finally explained in physics breakthrough (no paywall)

Physics Breakthrough in Ghosts, UFOs, Ultraterrestrial Technology, and Interdimensional Worlds (2 of 4)

Nov 18, 2023

Book cover of “New Age Physics” by Roland Michel Tremblay, showing an abstract fractal futuristic alien landscape or intergalactic highway. Theory of Everything based on consciousness, expansion, frequency and density of matter. Physics breakthrough in UFOs, ultraterrestrial technology and interdimensional worlds. — *New Age Physics* by Roland Michel Tremblay, book cover

2. Gravity and orbits finally explained in physics breakthrough

No one has ever identified a force acting at a distance, emanating from matter, attracting objects together, while attracting us to Earth, as Isaac Newton suggested. Nor can we find a proof, of Albert Einstein’s proposed curved sheet of spacetime, distorted by heavy objects, that all objects would follow in their course.

Instead, in a new physics breakthrough, the Earth could be expanding in all directions, at a constant rate of 4.9 metres per second, pushing us upwards, while keeping us on the ground. Raindrops and snowflakes might not really be falling to Earth, they could be free floating in the air, until the expansion of the Earth catches up with them. The reason objects appear to attract each other, could be because they are expanding, and the distance between them, would reduce as they expand.

First, Newtonian gravity as a force pulling you to the ground. Second, Einstein's Space Elevator, where being accelerated in space away from Earth, is the same as Newtonian Gravity on Earth (the Principle of Equivalence). Third, Atomic Expansion Theory: Expanding Planet, where the expansion of Earth is pushing you upwards. — Figure 1 (2-3) Progression of ideas leading to Atomic Expansion Theory

And your first question now should be, why can’t I see anything expand around me? If you were yourself expanding, along with your measuring instruments, how could you possibly tell, if everything else around you, were expanding or not? You couldn’t, the whole process of expansion, would be invisible to you. But it is still happening behind the scenes, and this is what we must visualise, in order to explain most phenomena that we observe.

Gravity is now defined, as the changing distance between expanding objects, as everything continually expands, at the same constant universal rate, of 0.00000077 of proportional size or percentage per second square. Gravity now depends on the size of the objects or particles, and their proportional expansion rate in time, instead of their mass.

In Newtonian gravity theory, there is a stronger force pulling to the ground a heavier falling object compared to a smaller one. In Expansion Theory, both objects are floating, and the Earth expands uniformly to meet both objects. — Figure 2 (2-2) Equally falling objects: Newton vs. Atomic Expansion Theory

And here we are, we now have a third significant theory of gravity, which comes with its own equations, and it is up to the scientific community, to decide which theory explains everything better.

If you fly near a planet made of styrofoam, the gravity from orbit will be the same, as if the planet was made of dense rocks. This is radically different from Newton and Einstein, since in their theories, gravity is based on the mass of the planets. However, once you land on the styrofoam planet, you would not weigh as much. This is because gravity on the ground, also depends on the density of matter, and on the centre of mass, from where matter expands and pushes from, which creates gravitational pressure.

This explains why gravity on the Moon, on the near side, where the centre of mass is located, is one sixth the gravity of the Earth, instead of the one quarter which was expected. Gravity on the Moon, should be just over one quarter that of the Earth, since it is just over a quarter of the size of the Earth. But we will find that, only at the edges of the visible Moon, it is a quarter of the gravity of the Earth. While on the hidden side, it will be one third. So, overall, once added together, it is the expected one quarter.

This means that we must have the wrong mass for the Moon, and as a result, the wrong density, because we used Newton’s equations based on mass for our calculations. Gravity on the surface is just not uniform, all around the Moon. These measurements could only be made on the ground, not from orbit, which makes any landing difficult to plan and achieve. It also explains why 60% of the unmanned missions landing on the moon so far ended in failure.

A reason for this failure to land unmanned missions, might be because the Apollo missions were faked. Especially when considering that none of the manned missions landing on the Moon ended in failure, which is quite astonishing, considering the failure rate of the unmanned missions. If the Apollo missions were fake, the one sixth gravity on the Moon might have been a lie, reflecting the expectation from mainstream science of the time, and it was never verified, neither from orbit nor on the ground. Therefore, gravity on the Moon could still be opened for debate.

If this is correct, it is quite possible that gravity on the Moon, is just over one quarter the one of the Earth, uniform all around the Moon. Possibly a bit less on the near side, and a bit more on the far side, because of the centre of mass located nearer us, but with no major difference.

As mentioned, we cannot see the expansion of all objects, astronomical bodies, and particles in the universe, because we are also expanding. And yet, we still witness the distance reduction between expanding objects, since space does not expand along with everything else.

There are two types of distance reductions involved in gravity. The first one is the absolute decrease in distance, when two objects are expanding at a constant rate. As a result, the distance reduces between the objects, at a constant rate.

But on top of the absolute decrease in distance, there is a relative motion effect, which further reduces the distance, between expanding particles or objects. Because something must justify, that the objects have expanded behind the scenes, that the distance has reduced between them as a result, all without changing size in our reality, from our point of view.

Behind the scenes, the absolute decrease in distance between two circles of a certain radius, is 6-radii separation. After doubling in size, the distance decreases to 4 original radii. The further relative decrease is due to those 4 original radii that are now only 2 larger radii, since after doubling, the circles have a larger radius. — Figure 3 (2-6) Absolute and relative distance decreases

The original separation between two circles, before doubling in size, is 6-radii. The separation after doubling is now 2-radii separation. But the circles remain the same size as before, as we cannot see the expansion. Since we expand with everything else, it appears to us as if only the distance changes. — Figure 4 (2-7) Same scenario as in Figure 3 as it actually appears

In other words, if two objects double in size, and the distance reduces between them, but afterwards, the objects are still the same size as before, then relatively speaking, there must be even less space than before. A metre before expansion, is now half a metre after the objects have doubled in size, because space does not expand along with everything else. This is called, the further relative decrease in distance in gravity. And this is why, the distance reduces as an acceleration, even although everything expands, at the same constant rate.

To put it simply, although objects and particles expand at a constant rate, the distance between them reduces as an acceleration, because of a relative motion effect, due to the geometry of expansion. The expansion behind the scenes, causes relative motion, which changes the speed and direction of motion of the objects, precisely because we cannot see the expansion.

For example, when you can see the expansion, a satellite orbiting the Earth, is in fact moving away from the Earth in a straight line, fast enough to escape the expansion of the planet. Once you can no longer see the expansion, you are left with a natural orbit effect, of the satellite simply orbiting the Earth. Why?

Behind the scenes on the left, if we could see the expansion of these spheres passing each other in space, the spheres are growing, and each second the distance between them is less, but they continue on their straight line motion. On the right, if we cannot see the expansion, the spheres remain the same size, but the distance actually reduces between them, leading to an orbit. — Figure 5 (3-6) Concept (left) and result (right) of the Natural Orbit Effect

Because, as the Earth and the satellite expand, and the distance between them reduces, the satellite is also moving away, enlarging the distance between them. In our resulting reality, the distance reduction due to the inner expansion, is cancelled by the satellite moving away. Thus, instead, we see a stable orbit, where the satellite always remains, more or less, at the same distance from Earth. This causes the natural orbit effect we witness.

The left frame of the diagram shows the underlying expansion concept as an object coasts past. As indicated by the distance arrows between the planet and the object, the distance to the ground reduces ever more rapidly as the object’s increasing relative velocity compounds. However, since we cannot actually see the underlying expansion dynamic, we see the resulting parabolic plunge of the object toward the planet (right frame). This is a purely geometric effect caused by the expanding planet. — Figure 6 (3-8) Expanding Planet Creates a Parabolic Relative Geometry

On the left, when we can see the expansion, we see an expanding planet approaching a satellite moving from the middle to the left in a straight line, with double arrows showing that the distance remains the same between the planet and the satellite. A house on the planet also moves up with the expansion, and to the left as the planet rotates. On the right, once we can no longer see the expansion, we see a resulting circular path in a geosynchronous orbit, as the satellite always remains above the house at the same distance, while the planet rotates to the left. — Figure 7 (3-9) A faster-moving object produces a circular orbit

A satellite in a geostationary orbit, viewed from behind the scenes, is a satellite which is moving away from the Earth, in a straight line, at exactly the right speed to match the expansion of the Earth. Consequently, the distance between the satellite and the Earth, always remains exactly the same. The result in our reality, is a satellite which remains immobile, at a specific location over the Earth, as if frozen in place.

This explains orbits, and shows how an effect of relative motion is created, between what is happening behind the scenes, and what we see in our resulting reality. A satellite does not need to be accelerating behind the scenes, for a relative motion effect to cause an acceleration, in our resulting reality. The geometry of expansion, naturally accelerates all objects orbiting each other, in a permanent slingshot effect affecting all orbits.

This results in a to-and-fro movement, because they are continually moving away from each other, but gravity is continually bringing them back together. Gravity being an acceleration, this creates a constant swinging of the objects around each other, which is continually accelerating the orbiting objects.

This is called relative motion, because what we see, depends on where we observe it from. Like from behind the scenes, where we can see the expansion, or from our resulting reality, where we cannot. Relativity is always about something we can see differently, depending on our point of view.

There is always only one event taking place, an expanding satellite moving in a straight line, away from the expanding Earth. But, from our point of view, where we cannot see the expansion, we see an orbit instead, along with all sorts of relative motion effects, which have a real impact on our reality.

Relative motion effects can cause accelerations or decelerations, of astronomical bodies or particles, but can also increase or decrease kinetic energy. Kinetic energy is the force of impact, objects and particles can have on anything they hit, which they acquire through their speed. This is how expansion can cause motion and create energy.

Go to the next section